Re: osf/1 slowness

Alex Bischoff (abischof@vt.edu)
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 16:12:17 -0400


At 02:58 PM 4/16/97 -0400, you wrote:
>seconds. I know that a pentium 100 is not faster than a DEC, and deschal
>cannot be optimized that much for a pentium (or is it?) One more thing,
Actually, I think that DESChall is highly optimized for a Pentium, since
that version is 99% assembler :).

Alex
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
mailto:abischof@vt.edu http://www.vt.edu:10021/A/abischof/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| export-a-crypto-system-sig RSA-3-lines-PERL |
| #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj |
| $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 |
| lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Help Crack DES Now! ----> http://www.frii.com/~rcv/deschall.htm