I'm also getting "Empty reply" messages back from deschall-u2t; however, I
*do* have libwww installed and happy (including the URI::Escape stuff); just
installed it, all 'make test's passed.
Um, do I *really* have to use perl5.003? I'm currently at 5.002 with
supplemental package installs such as libnet, MD5, Socket, and the libwww.
U2T 2228: UDP server started on port 8669 at Wed May 14 19:19:16 1997
U2T 2228: connection from bacchus.vsc.can.ibm.com [ 9.29.159.133 ] at port ...
U2T 17080: GET http://deschall-gateway.verser.frii.com:2345/I2%2022%20%3F%2...
U2T 17080: sent TCP request: I2 22 ? V0.214 Apr 4 1997 15:04:13 at Wed May...
U2T 17080: got raw reply: at Wed May 14 19:20:54 1997
U2T 17080: got TCP reply: at Wed May 14 19:20:54 1997
U2T 17080: Empty reply from T2U proxy. at Wed May 14 19:20:54 1997
I took the liberty of adding the "got raw reply" line just before the unescape
call, just to check if in fact unescape was eating the reply: nope. Bueller?
Am I getting through to the deschall-gateway?
The TCP requests would have come via mpngate1.ca.us.ibm.com (or mpngate2
or...)...
-- ______________________________________________________________________________ Alex Murray (reporting live from Win^H^Haterpeg) alex_murray@vnet.ibm.com IBM Canada, Call Center Solutions +1 905 316-4243 fax 316-2156 _#include_<disclaim.h>___________________________+1_204_934_2646_(until_5/30)_