I understood that the Win clients were somewhat slower than some of
the others, but the numbers you quote areabout 60% of what I get with the
OS/2 client running networking, having object desktop open (an OS/2
shell) leaving my mailer open and occasionally writing a note and sending i=
t,
leaving netscape open, playing windows hearts in a win-os/2 session. While
none of these takes many cpu cycles, you say "Nothing" else is running on
the system. If mine is idle, then the 2^30 keys level takes about 3400 sec.
Of course if I print a hugh graphics file on my HP, it jumps to 5-6k!
So are yours really normal? Is that about what other Win95 users get?
If so, is the Win95 overhead that much, or is the client that much slower? =
This is an honest question, not an intent to start OS wars (I know mine is
superior (;-)>.
Mark adams@acs.ucalgary.ca
Warped X4
taxol: Liberal plan for increasing revenue