If someone has Rockes number they might give him a call... I am going to
sleep now :)
Scott
PS: here is short info on the AS switch:
>We will be making a BGP4 Topology change on our anaheim hub on Sunday
>night at midnight (the morning of 6/2/97). WE will be chanign our hub AS
>over from 1795 to 1239. Unless you have specific route-maps, etc. that are
>dependant upon our existing hub AS, it should require no more confiuration
>changes than changing the statement
>
>neighbor XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX remote-as 1795
>
>..
>..
>
>
>to
>
>neighbor XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX remote-as 1239
>
>and then filling in the rest of the session as your existing one is. If
>you have any questions, you can call our NOC at 1-800-232-3458, as this is
>a personal mail, and I cannot respond in as timely a fashion as I would
>like if you were to respond here.
At 8:22 AM -0700 6/2/97, Leareth wrote:
>> All night I have seen the clients get slow response when getting a new
>> block, but for the last half hour the clients are not getting through at
>> all. I am not noticing any other connectivity problems.
>
>
>~ (2) traceroute keymaster.verser.frii.com
>traceroute to doc.verser.frii.com (206.168.13.85), 30 hops max, 40 byte
>packets
> 1 vccfr4-113.its.rpi.edu (128.113.113.254) 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms
> 2 ny-alb-2-H2/0-T3.nysernet.net (169.130.22.5) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms
> 3 ny-alb-1-F0/0.nysernet.net (169.130.20.1) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms
> 4 ny-nyc-2-H4/0-T3.nysernet.net (169.130.1.13) 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms
> 5 ny-dc-1-H3/0-T3.nysernet.net (169.130.16.6) 12 ms 14 ms 13 ms
> 6 sl-dc-1-F0/0.sprintlink.net (144.228.20.1) 13 ms 13 ms 17 ms
> 7 sl-kc-1-H3/0-T3.sprintlink.net (144.228.10.74) 43 ms 46 ms 45 ms
> 8 sl-che-2-H2/0-T3.sprintlink.net (144.228.10.82) 56 ms 57 ms 56 ms
> 9 sl-che-3-F0/0.sprintlink.net (144.224.10.3) 54 ms 58 ms 56 ms
>10 sl-cica-2-H0-T3.sprintlink.net (144.224.13.6) 60 ms 61 ms 59 ms
>11 gw23.boulder.co.coop.net (199.45.132.131) 60 ms 66 ms 61 ms
>12 199.45.130.182 (199.45.130.182) 68 ms 70 ms 69 ms
>13 pm-ftc-a.frii.com (204.144.244.133) 67 ms 67 ms 69 ms
>14 * * *
>15 * * *
>16 * * *
>
>doh! we're losing some serious crunching time here....