Re: Other Efforts

techs@obfuscation.org
Wed, 11 Jun 1997 00:19:33 -0400 (EDT)


> Why wouldn't a sequential distribution of keys be good? If the failure of
> key X implies nothing about key X+1, then the probability that the real key
> is X+1 is the same as any other unchecked key.
>
> I would think that a sequential distribution of keys would simplify the
> search. Furthermore, if all three major efforts searched three completely
> seperate areas of the keyspace, the contest would be over sooner (since
> there would be no overlap of the searched areas) and it wouldn't change the
> chance that anybody in DESCHALL would win.

for the single effort (not a combined effort of three (or more) groups,
splitting the keyspace into oh... 8 groups, and then working away from
those 8 marks in both directions and handing out keys gives a better
coverage of the entire keyspace than working from one end toward the other.

of course, a truly random attack on the keyspace would probably still be
more efficient at finding the key quickly.

and of course, i could still be totally wrong.. I make no claims at knowing
anything of algorithm design. Everyone can probably ignore me and their
lives would be better for it. :)

-- 
(emf:erik fichtner:techs:discursive melancholia)
"It's true. No man is an island. But if you take a bunch of dead 
guys and tie 'em together, they make a pretty good raft."- Red Meat
http://www.obfuscation.org/~techs      N 39 10.409'  W 77 11.750'