I found it quite ironic, too, since that machine is the slowest of the 8
participating from iNetZ.
>Quite appropriate, considering the previous discussion about if small
>participation is worth it. We've now got 2 data points: In both the 48bit
>RC and 56bit DES Challenges, the winner was not in the top 20. Past
>results do not necessarly indicate future performance. :-)
Not even the top 100. #128 overall, to be precise. :)